Fine-Tuning CBC and Adaptive CBC Questionnaires (2009)

In this article, the author (Orme) uses random split-sample experiments to test different ways of asking CBC and Adaptive CBC (ACBC) questionnaires. Specifically, he examines:

  • Use of minimal overlap vs. modest overlap for CBC questionnaires (modest overlap seems to improve results)
  • ACBC for small designs--just 4 attributes (ACBC is shown to work as well as CBC)
  • Placing “Unacceptable” screening questions prior to “Must-Have” screening questions in ACBC (seems to work better)
  • Individual-level (customized) utility constraints in ACBC (no benefit shown for this 4-attribute data set, though benefits should be greater for larger, more demanding designs)
  • Whether giving respondents a “consistency game” will improve their data and their experience (minimal gains in fit observed, but with the risk of annoying about 1/5 of the respondents)

  Download PDF   View in new window

Lighthouse Studio

Lighthouse Studio (formerly SSI Web) is our flagship software for producing and analyzing online and offline surveys. It contains modules for general interviewing, choice-based conjoint, adaptive choice-based conjoint, adaptive choice analysis, choice-value analysis, and maxdiff exercises.

Try Lighthouse Studio

  Buy Lighthouse Studio

Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis

New to conjoint analysis? Pick up a copy of Bryan Orme's best-selling book today!

Learn More